String and net-patterned salt marshes: rare landscape elements of boreal Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
String and net-patterned salt marshes: Rare landscape elements of boreal Canada.Canadian Field-Naturalist 115(3): 406-412.A rare form of wetland, string and net-patterned salt marshes, exist in and near Wood Buffalo National Park in northeastern Alberta and the adjacent Northwest Territories.In two wetlands (Benchmark and Lobstick creeks) examined in August 2001, a benthic blue-green algae/diatom community covered flark bottoms.Calamagrostis stricta (Narrow Reed Grass) and Triglochin maritima (Seaside Arrow-grass) at Benchmark Creek and Atriplex subspicata (Saltbush), Puccinellia nuttalliana (Nuttall's Salt-Meadow Grass), and Triglochin palustris (Slender Arrow-grass) at Lobstick Creek dominated the strings.Hordeum jubatum (Foxtail Barley), Puccinellia nuttalliana, Spergularia marina (Salt-marsh Sand Spurry), and Triglochin palustris were common to both wetlands.Other noteworthy plant occurrences included Aster ericoides (Tufted White Prairie Aster), A. pauciflorus (Few-flowered Aster), Carex mackenziei (Mackenzie's Sedge), Glaux maritima (Sea Milkwort), Monolepis nuttalliana (Spear-leaved Goosefoot), Plantago eriopoda (Saline Plantain), P. maritima (Sea-side Plantain), Scirpus paludosus (Prairie Bulrush), and Suaeda calceoliformis (Western Sea-blite).The wetlands observed were associated with valleys.In order to form, they may require a gentle elevational gradient for lateral flow of saline surface water.The patterns may be related also to soil processes involving excessive soil salts.Soil augering revealed an insufficient amount of peat for the sites to be classified as fens; soils appear to classify as Rego Humic Gleysols.These rare wetlands require study of their mode of formation, distribution, and their biota.I suggest a new type designation: interior patterned saline marsh.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".