MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391475942 · doi:10.5962/p.363974

Site characteristics of a repetitively used Harlequin Duck, Histrionicus histrionicus, nest in northern Labrador

2000· article· en· W4391475942 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Tony E. Chubbs, Bruce Mactavish, Perry G. Trimper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Newfoundland and Labrador
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNest (protein structural motif)FisheryGeographyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of field investigations for the Voisey's Bay Mine Mill Environmental Assessment in 1995, baseline studies on Harlequin Ducks, Histrionicus histrionicus, were initiated around the proposed site on Labrador's north coast.During ground brood surveys in 1997, a Harlequin Duck nest was discovered.This was the second Harlequin Duck nest ever found in Labrador.The exact same site was used again in 1998 indicating favorable nesting habitat and repetitive nest-site use for Harlequin Ducks in Labrador.This finding contributes to our meager knowledge of the species breeding habits in Labrador and has implications on future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207