Legislation of euthanasia in Portugal: The psychiatrist’s role
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Netherlands (2001) and Belgium (2002) were pioneer countries in euthanasia legislation, and it has been progressively implemented in Luxembourg (2009), Colombia (2015), Canada (2016), the state of Victoria in Australia (2017), and New Zealand (2021). After these, the most recent approvals of euthanasia-related legislation were Spain's Organic Law (2021), and recently, in December 2022, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide were approved by the Portuguese parliament, following four years of discussion.In this context, an increasing number of countries are currently regulating or considering the inclusion of euthanasia as a healthcare service, which places an urgent need to define the health professionals' and particularly psychiatrists' roles and participation in this process. Currently, these assessments are limited by the lack of scientific precision in the methods used to determine patients' decision-making capacity, conditioning this process to psychiatrists' personal beliefs.This presentation will provide a comprehensive overview of Portuguese legislation, highlighting the psychiatrists' involvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".