New record of aquatic snakes (Squamata, Palaeophiidae) from the Paleocene of South America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Paleocene deposits from the Cerrejón Formation (Colombia, South America) have provided abundant snake remains. All this material has been assigned to the giant snake Titanoboa cerrejonensis. Here, we describe six vertebrae from among the referred materials that do not correspond to Titanoboa. All six vertebrae are morphologically identical, of a similar size, and display a distinct morphology that differs from Titanoboa. This new and unnamed taxon is a large snake estimated to be around eight meters in total length. Anatomical comparisons show that these vertebrae possess certain features typical of the Palaeophiidae, a group of extinct snakes of uncertain relationships known almost exclusively from vertebrae. Among the Palaeophiidae, the new taxon resembles the more generalized forms assigned to the genus Palaeophis, but lacks the extreme aquatic adaptations that define forms assigned to the genus Pterosphenus. We regard the new taxon as an undetermined palaeophiine but do not assign it to Palaeophis as a number of features differ from that described genus. This new record expands the known diversity of aquatic snakes from the Paleogene of South America and provides a substantial new record for the paleogeographic distribution of the Palaeophiidae. The oldest records are from the Cretaceous of Africa, while Paleocene records are poorly known and restricted to Africa, North America, and Europe. The majority of vertebral forms assigned to Palaeophiidae are from the Eocene, principally from the Tethys region, with only one previous South American record coming from the Eocene of Ecuador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".