P4PC: A Portal for Bioinformatics Resources of piRNAs and circRNAs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) are two kinds of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that play important roles in epigenetic regulation, transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional regulation of many biological processes. Although there exist various resources, it is still challenging to select such resources for specific research projects on ncRNAs. Methods: In order to facilitate researchers in finding the appropriate bioinformatics sources for studying ncRNAs, we created a novel portal named P4PC that provides computational tools and data sources of piRNAs and circRNAs. Results: 249 computational tools, 126 databases and 420 papers are manually curated in P4PC. All entries in P4PC are classified in 5 groups and 26 subgroups. The list of resources is summarized in the first page of each group. Conclusion: According to their research proposes, users can quickly select proper resources for their research projects by viewing detail information and comments in P4PC. Database URL is http://www.ibiomedical.net/Portal4PC/ and https://43.138.46.5/Portal4PC/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it