Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines menstrual cycle characteristics and associated symptoms in 200 females aged 18 to 45 with regular menstrual cycles. Using a dedicated app, participants meticulously recorded menstrual syndromes over three months. Results show a mean cycle length of 28.5 days (SD = 2.3) and an average cessation duration of 5.2 days (SD = 1.1). Common symptoms include cramps (85%, severity = 6.2), mood swings (70%, severity = 5.8), and bloating (60%, severity = 4.5). Correlation analysis indicates a positive association between cycle length and cramp severity (r = 0.42, p < 0.01). However, no significant correlations are found between cycle length and mood swing (r = 0.12, p > 0.05) or bloating severity (r = 0.18, p > 0.05). This study provides nuanced insights into menstrual cycle variability, emphasizing the necessity of individualized symptom assessments for comprehensive reproductive health. The findings highlight the complexity of symptom manifestation and suggest that factors beyond cycle duration influence mood swing and bloating severity. This research lays the groundwork for future investigations into the multifaceted dynamics of menstrual health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".