MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391488576 · doi:10.23880/whsj-16000204

Pain Management during Pregnancy and Lactation

2024· article· en· W4391488576 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rehan Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Health Science Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of KarachiUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsLactationPregnancyObstetricsPain managementMedicineGynecologyPhysical therapyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnancy and lactation are important stages in a woman’s existence, and pain management becomes a difficult problem at some point. The well-being of each mother and the growing fetus or breastfeeding toddler must be cautiously considered when selecting appropriate pain management techniques. This abstract evaluates modern knowledge and guidelines for pain control during pregnancy and lactation, focusing on the dangers and advantages of numerous pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. During pregnancy, women usually experience physiological changes that may exacerbate their current pain conditions or result in new ones. The use of certain pain medications, especially non-steroidal anti-inflammatory capsules (NSAIDs) and opioids has been linked to potentially destructive effects on fetal development. Consequently, healthcare providers often choose non-pharmacological interventions, including physical therapy, acupuncture, and relaxation techniques, as first-line remedies. Furthermore, a thorough evaluation of the risk-to-benefit ratio is essential when considering the use of any medication throughout pregnancy, and a session with a healthcare expert is important. During the lactation period, the ability to transfer medication through breast milk to infants raises issues regarding the protection of medications used for pain management. Healthcare companies have to remember the drug’s pharmacokinetics, its potential effect on the little one’s health, and the mother’s potential to care for the infant while on medicine. Opioid use at some point during breastfeeding is a concern because of the hazards of sedation, respiratory despair, and withdrawal signs inside the infant. In comparison, a few medicines are considered, especially those that are safe throughout lactation, and alternative non-pharmacological interventions have to be explored where possible. An interdisciplinary approach involving obstetricians, anesthesiologists, pediatricians, and lactation consultants is essential for developing comprehensive pain control plans during pregnancy and lactation. Alternatively, pain relief for the mother is critical to ensuring her well-being and a successful bond with the little one. Concurrently, minimizing any capacity risk to the fetus or breastfeeding infants is of maximum significance. Moreover, affected person education and shared selection-making play a critical role in supporting ladies to make informed choices about pain management strategies that stabilize their pain alleviation wishes and the safety of their unborn or breastfeeding child.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s Health Science JournalSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207