Stochastic Physics-Informed Deep Generative Network Scenario Generation: Application on Responsive Residential Load Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a stochastic model for the optimal residential responsive loads power scheduling considering participants’ satisfaction. In this context, firstly, a physical-informed based generative adversarial network (PI-GAN) network is designed for scenario generation with a high correlation with the actual data. In this network, conventional GANs are improved to learn spatial-temporal features of the residential loads and physics-informed concepts. To realize the spatial feature of the complex and highly nonlinear time series like residential loads, a residual convolutional neural network (Res-CNN) is considered to learn the spatial features, while the fully temporal features are realized by gated recurrent neural networks (GNN). Then, generated scenarios are used to cover the uncertainty associated with residential loads and provide the optimal results for responsive loads, including shiftable and curtailable loads. The numerical results on actual data in London, England, verify the effectiveness of the proposed stochastic framework and superiority by comparison with conditional GAN and improved version of GAN in scenario generations impact of stochastic demand response program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".