MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Intelligent Power Control Technique for a Type-3 Wind Energy Conversion System with LVRT Capability and Improved Dynamic Performance

2023· article· en· W4391495747 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Shamsul Arifin, M. Nasir Uddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerControl theory (sociology)ConvertersLow voltage ride throughComputer scienceStatorGridController (irrigation)Wind speedEngineeringVoltageAC powerControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper represents a novel neuro-fuzzy (NF) based intelligent power control (IPC) technique for a Type-3 wind energy conversion system (WECS), which can achieve low voltage ride through (LVRT) capability by managing grid side disturbance of WECS. The proposed IPC technique considers the errors between command and actual values of real and reactive powers of the stator as inputs and processes these inputs through two NF networks to generate d-q axis switching signals for the switches of rotor side converters (RSCs). Additionally, a hybrid training method is developed to train the NF system parameters. The performance of the proposed control technique is tested in simulation under different grid disturbance and wind speed variations. Furthermore, a numerical comparative study of performances is conducted between the proposed and the classical proportional-integral control technique at different operating conditions. A laboratory prototype of Type-3 WECS is also built to test the performance of the proposed IPC technique in real-time using the DSP controller board DS-1104. Both the simulation and experimental results prove the LVRT capability of the proposed scheme as well as its satisfactory dynamic response of the WECS coping with variations in wind speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207