MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391495897 · doi:10.1017/s1041610223002119

Using Simulation-Based Learning (Gamified Educational Network) to Provide Micro-credentialing for Dementia Care Workers

2023· article· en· W4391495897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Winnie Sun, Mary Chiu, Abdulatif Burhan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Psychogeriatrics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDementiaCredentialMedical educationBest practiceGeneral partnershipExperiential learningWorkforceContext (archaeology)CredentialingNursingMedicinePedagogyComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background:Dementia care is a critical area of need in the community and institutional settings, with estimated one-third of seniors younger than 80 years of age with dementia living in institutional settings and this proportion increases to 42% for those 80 years and older in Canada. It is of critical importance to promote excellence and best practices in dementia care by preparing for well-trained dementia workforce through capacity building.Methods:This project developed a dementia care micro-credential education to enable competency development of new graduates and upskilling of workers through simulation-based learning. This micro-credential program leveraged interdisciplinary partnership, to develop nine core modules related to best practices in dementia care, facilitated with a Gamified Educational Network (GEN). GEN is an evidence-based learning management platform that provides learners with a simulated and immersive experience to engage them in a virtual learning environment that allows for rich experiential interaction with other users and its content.Outcome:Face and content validity was established by an inter-professional committee including geriatric psychiatry, nursing, social work, occupational therapy, behavioral therapy, knowledge mobilization and simulation education experts. Next phase will begin to establish construct validity. It is expected that GEN will have a positive impact on increasing learner’s motivation and engagement in the educational tasks, as well as improving learner’s competencies and outcomes through its multi-modal approaches, including gamification (usage of game-based elements in a non-game context to engage learners and promote learning), active observational practice, independent hands-on practice, case-based discussion, peer-to-peer assessment, expert facilitated feedback, skills debriefing and reflective practice.Conclusion:This micro-credential program will provide an enhanced dementia care curriculum for building capacity of existing workers, and those entering into the workforce to promote a dementia-friendly environment for older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational PsychogeriatricsSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207