MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391503362 · doi:10.29391/2024.103.009

Effect of Wire Preheat and Feed Rate in X80 Steel Laser Root Welds: Part 1 — Microstructure

2024· article· en· W4391503362 on OpenAlexafffund
Hanwen Yang, Nazmul Huda, XIAOYE ZHAO, A.P. Gerlich, J. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueWelding Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAcicular ferriteMaterials scienceMetallurgyHeat-affected zoneBainiteWeldingAusteniteMicrostructureGas metal arc weldingMartensiteFerrite (magnet)Arc weldingSubmerged arc weldingLaser beam weldingAcicularComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser welding with cold versus hot wire feed was employed as a root pass to weld X80 pipeline steel. The influences of wire feed rate and preheat on the fusion zone microstructure were investigated. Increasing the wire feed rate helped generate acicular ferrite in the weld metal, and preheating the wire further suppressed the formation of bainite. The acicular ferrite in the upper region of the fusion zone was finer than that in the lower region, which was due to an increase in nucleation sites available. Five fill and cap passes were applied by gas metal arc welding to fill the remaining top part of the groove. Compared to arc welding with a higher heat input, laser welding led to finer prior austenite grains and smaller bainite packet size in the coarse-grained heat-affected zone and limited the formation of martensite-austenite constituents in the intercritically reheated coarse-grained heat-affected zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWelding JournalSame topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207