MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391503595 · doi:10.1061/jwrmd5.wreng-6171

Roles of Value in the Evaluation and Modeling of Decision Strategies for Pipe Maintenance in Water Distribution Networks

2024· article· en· W4391503595 on OpenAlexaff
Santiago Zuluaga, Shoshanna Saxe, Bryan Karney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue (mathematics)Distribution (mathematics)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceOperations researchEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water distribution networks (WDNs) are essential infrastructure systems, providing vital drinking and process water for urban health and economic vitality. The unfolding choices of how and when to maintain these aging networks reflect the values (priorities) invoked by decision makers, and, in turn, these choices determine the value of the service delivered, ranging from adequate water delivery to its alignment with broader environmental, social, and economic objectives. However, the extent to which asset management strategies acknowledge and incorporate diverse values through their priorities, assumptions, and objectives, remains limited both in practice and in modeling research. This paper proposes a computational model to evaluate the performance of long-term pipe maintenance strategies through Monte Carlo simulations of sequential pipe maintenance activities, capturing the probabilistic nature of pipe failure and its impacts across multidimensional performance metrics. Specifically, the model explores how operator priorities affect the choice of different repair and replacement strategies, and the effects of these value profiles across multiple dimensions including both system-level performance and the perception of different stakeholders such as users and service regulators. An illustrative example of a theoretical distribution network shows how valuing pipe replacement over short-term repair can both reduce pipe failure risk and lead to notable improvements in service, environmental, and monetary outcomes. Through an exploration of stakeholder value perception, this study shows that there is potential for alignment between societal objectives such as water losses and energy use, and between global service outcomes and direct maintenance costs for network operators. This study provides a novel exploration of the relationship between value (i.e., preference, priorities, and objectives) across stakeholders, and proposes methodological improvements in pipe maintenance modeling to better reflect the uncertain nature of WDN operation and a generalized and granular approach to pipe maintenance modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Resources Planning and ManagementSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207