MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391512251 · doi:10.5962/p.363505

Bill Dore's notes on the Kaladar Cactus (Opuntia fragilis)

2002· article· en· W4391512251 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Richard J. Staniforth, William J. Cody, Katherine A. Frego

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegAgricultural Institute of CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCactusBiologyGeographyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysis of his specimens, notes and letters regarding an isolated colony of Brittle Prickly-pear Cactus (Opuntia fragilis) from Kaladar in eastern Ontario led to the unfolding of a botanical story of discovery and rediscovery.This colony was first discovered in 1934, the location apparently lost and subsequently rediscovered in 1947, more or less neglected, and then brought to the attention of a wider circle of botanists in the mid 1960s.Attempts to determine its taxonomic identification were thwarted by the infrequency of flowering until the early 1960s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207