MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391512389 · doi:10.1142/s0219519424400281

INTRAOPERATIVE SURGICAL NAVIGATION BASED ON LASER SCANNER FOR IMAGE-GUIDED ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY

2024· article· en· W4391512389 on OpenAlex
Fang Li, Conggang Huang, Le Wang, Chuxi Zhang, Xinrong Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Radiography and Imaging
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaShanghai Municipal Health Commission
KeywordsScannerMedicineImage-guided surgeryOral and maxillofacial surgeryLaser scanningLaser surgerySurgeryComputer visionLaserArtificial intelligenceRadiologyComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In oral and maxillofacial surgery, computer-assisted navigation technologies have been widely used to achieve intraoperative positioning. The traditional methods mainly rely on the experience of doctors and the difference between the locations of key points in the surgical area and the preoperative planning, which have certain limitations. In this paper, a new intraoperative surgical navigation framework based on mobile laser scanner is proposed, which ensures that surgery is performed accurately according to the preoperative planning. The framework mainly includes two parts. First, the real-time surface reconstruction of the anatomy should be realized during the operation. Second, the acquired image is matched to the planned image in real time. Although the most common method of surface reconstruction is to render the volume directly from raw data or render the surface from the segmented data using computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) data, this method is too complicated for performing the real-time operation during surgery. Furthermore, a new surface registration technique is proposed for image-guided oral and maxillofacial surgery based on the point sets. To improve the registration accuracy and robustness, the point sets are modeled by Mixed Student’s t-Distribution model. In the experiments, the point sets of CT data are from 10 patients with craniomaxillofacial diseases and the surface point set is from the LRS. The TRE of 10 data was less than 1[Formula: see text]mm. Compared with the paired-point registration method and Iterative Closest Point algorithm, the results demonstrated better performance of the proposed method, the surgical situation can be displayed in real time during the surgical process, and any differences from the surgical plan can also be reflected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it