Environmental Determinants and Hygiene Habits Related to the Development of Acute Respiratory Infections in Adults Attending P/s OPC, León III Quarter, 2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute respiratory infections (HAIs) include a complex and heterogeneous group of diseases considered a public health problem; The WHO estimates about 3.9 million deaths annually; In Nicaragua it is one of the pathologies that most affects the population.The main objective of this study is to describe the environmental determinants and hygiene habits related to the development of acute respiratory infections in older adults, and thus evaluate how much these factors participate.The present study is of a cross-sectional quantitative descriptive type, where a sample of 375 people aged 18-90 years was worked, who belong to sector 41 and 42 of the Oscar Prez Cassar health post, to whom a survey was conducted that It was subsequently processed by the SPSS statistical program.Acute respiratory infections are one of the main reasons for consultation in Nicaragua; Therefore, environmental determinants influence its incidence, and hygiene habits.Among the environmental determinants that had the greatest relevance were exposures to dust with 85% of the population, followed by the development of respiratory processes due to change of season 68%.These factors, since they are not modifiable, have a greater relationship in the development of HAI.Hygiene habits 99% of the population practices hand washing, 52% do not use a mask, and 51% do not change their toothbrush after an episode of flu and cough; Hygiene habits are modifiable, they serve as measures to minimize the risk of suffering from HAIs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".