MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391520930 · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2024.01.019

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

2024· article· en· W4391520930 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kwun M. Fong, Adam Rosenthal, Dorothy J. Giroux, Katherine K. Nishimura, Jeremy J. Erasmus, Yolande Lievens, Mirella Marino, Edith M. Marom, Paul Martin Putora, Navneet Singh, Francisco Suárez, Ramón Rami–Porta, Frank C. Detterbeck, Wilfried Eberhardt, Hisao Asamura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArthrex GmbHHyogo College of MedicineTechnische Universität MünchenNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversidade de São PauloSeoul National UniversityNational Institutes of HealthOhio State UniversityUniversity of LeicesterInstituto Nacional do Câncer, Ministério da SaúdeNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAix-Marseille UniversitéUniversité Hassan II de CasablancaMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterInternational Association for the Study of Lung CancerYale UniversityAstraZenecaShanghai Chest HospitalMount Sinai Health SystemAnkara UniversitesiBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsMedicineNinthLung cancerLung cancer stagingOncologyMedical physicsInternal medicineRadiologyGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.060
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0600.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0050.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.433 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic OncologySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207