La influencia de la seguridad energética en el desarrollo de la autonomía estratégica europea: Cambios definitorios necesarios para potenciar el despertar geopolítico de la UE.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La invasión rusa de Ucrania ha despertado geopolíticamente a la UE. Tras el inicio de la guerra, los Estados miembros tomaron consciencia de las vulnerabilidades que afronta el proyecto común, principalmente la gran dependencia energética de Rusia, la cual tenía además efectos limitadores sobre su autonomía estratégica. Debido a que la Declaración de Versalles llama a redefinir la forma en que los socios entienden su seguridad energética, este trabajo propone un nuevo esquema basado en los elementos que son imprescindibles para garantizar un suministro estable y avanzar hacia la autonomía del sistema de energía, un proyecto que, de completarse, permitirá potenciar la capacidad europea de proyectar poder en la escena internacional y servirá como uno de los pivotes más sólidos para la definitiva consolidación de la autonomía estratégica de la UE en un contexto de creciente rivalidad geopolítica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".