MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391528070 · doi:10.1080/00330124.2023.2295347

A Case for Naming Racial Violence

2024· article· en· W4391528070 on OpenAlex
Darius Scott

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Professional Geographer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipForegroundingCriminologyGenocideRace (biology)Gender studiesCriticismPrincipal (computer security)Critical race theoryRacismPolitical scienceSociologyLawArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the United States, scholarship concerning race has been the target of politicized criticism. This derision lacks concern for the matters of life and death at the center of racial scholarship, which necessarily includes histories of massacres, lynching, genocide, and extrajudicial killings in the young story of the United States alone. This article centers on the matter of trauma and presents it as an influential aspect of Black life in the United States. A principal aim is foregrounding the testimony of men who survived a Citation1947 massacre of imprisoned Black men near Brunswick, Georgia. The writing also makes a case for valuing studies that consider lived experiences of acute racial violence and the traumas that unstably emanate from it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it