Multiplexed Assays of Variant Effect and Automated Patch-clamping Improve <i>KCNH2</i> -LQTS Variant Classification and Cardiac Event Risk Stratification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a lethal arrhythmia syndrome, frequently caused by rare loss-of-function variants in the potassium channel encoded by KCNH2 . Variant classification is difficult, often owing to lack of functional data. Moreover, variant-based risk stratification is also complicated by heterogenous clinical data and incomplete penetrance. Here, we sought to test whether variant-specific information, primarily from high-throughput functional assays, could improve both classification and cardiac event risk stratification in a large, harmonized cohort of KCNH2 missense variant heterozygotes. Methods We quantified cell-surface trafficking of 18,796 variants in KCNH2 using a Multiplexed Assay of Variant Effect (MAVE). We recorded KCNH2 current density for 533 variants by automated patch clamping (APC). We calibrated the strength of evidence of MAVE data according to ClinGen guidelines. We deeply phenotyped 1,458 patients with KCNH2 missense variants, including QTc, cardiac event history, and mortality. We correlated variant functional data and Bayesian LQTS penetrance estimates with cohort phenotypes and assessed hazard ratios for cardiac events. Results Variant MAVE trafficking scores and APC peak tail currents were highly correlated (Spearman Rank-order ρ = 0.69). The MAVE data were found to provide up to pathogenic very strong evidence for severe loss-of-function variants. In the cohort, both functional assays and Bayesian LQTS penetrance estimates were significantly predictive of cardiac events when independently modeled with patient sex and adjusted QT interval (QTc); however, MAVE data became non-significant when peak-tail current and penetrance estimates were also available. The area under the ROC for 20-year event outcomes based on patient-specific sex and QTc (AUC 0.80 [0.76-0.83]) was improved with prospectively available penetrance scores conditioned on MAVE (AUC 0.86 [0.83-0.89]) or attainable APC peak tail current data (AUC 0.84 [0.81-0.88]). Conclusion High throughput KCNH2 variant MAVE data meaningfully contribute to variant classification at scale while LQTS penetrance estimates and APC peak tail current measurements meaningfully contribute to risk stratification of cardiac events in patients with heterozygous KCNH2 missense variants. Clinical Perspective What is new? A two-order of magnitude increase in the set of calibrated functional data for KCNH2 -LQTS is provided by two complementary KCNH2 assays Proactively available variant scores are presented for all possible missense variants by using a LQTS penetrance estimation framework conditioned on high-throughput MAVE data Variant functional data, in addition to patient features of corrected QT interval and sex, significantly improve modeling of 20-year cardiac event outcomes What are the clinical implications? Readily available MAVE scores for thousands of variants may facilitate classification of new variants discovered in individuals with suspected LQTS Scores and penetrance estimates are readily searchable at variantbrowser.org for community inquiry Both automated patch-clamp data and quantitative LQTS penetrance estimates, conditioned on MAVE data, improve prediction of 20-year cardiac event outcomes in a large cohort of KCNH2 heterozygotes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".