MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391529574 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.3c01462

Growth of Metal Organic Frameworks on the Surface of Individual Cellulose Nanocrystals

2024· article· en· W4391529574 on OpenAlexafffund
Kyoungil Cho, Zongzhe Li, Mark J. MacLachlan

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMetal-organic frameworkNanocrystalCelluloseMetalChemical engineeringNanotechnologyMaterials scienceSurface (topology)Crystal growthChemistryOrganic chemistryCrystallographyAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composites of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are appealing for constructing new materials with applications in catalysts, photonics, gas separation, and environmental remediation. In this paper, the growth of various MOFs on individual CNCs was investigated by varying the growth conditions to obtain a hybrid material, MOF@CNCs. While ZIF-8 and UiO-66 uniformly grew on the surface of CNCs, other common MOFs (e.g., MIL-96, MOF-808, HKUST-1, and MOF-5) exhibited irregular growth patterns. The morphology of the MOF@CNCs materials obtained depended on the metals and ligand used. Furthermore, we investigated the growth of Prussian blue (PB) on CNCs, but we were unable to realize well-defined composites with the framework attached to the surface of CNCs. These investigations are important to realize CNC@MOF composite materials where individual CNCs are functionalized with MOFs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystal Growth & DesignSame topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207