MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391529975 · doi:10.1101/2024.02.04.24302268

Structural brain abnormalities and aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia: Mega-analysis of data from 2095 patients and 2861 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium

2024· preprint· en· W4391529975 on OpenAlexaff
Jelle Lamsma, Adrian Raine, Seyed Mostafa Kia, Wiepke Cahn, Dominic Arold, Nerisa Banaj, Annarita Barone, Katharina Brosch, Rachel M. Brouwer, Arturo Brunetti, Vince D. Calhoun, Qian Hui Chew, Sunah Choi, Young‐Chul Chung, Mariateresa Ciccarelli, Derin Cobia, Sirio Cocozza, Udo Dannlowski, Paola Dazzan, Andrea de Bartolomeis, Marta Di Forti, Alexandre Dumais, Jesse T. Edmond, Stefan Ehrlich, Ulrika Evermann, Kira Flinkenflügel, Foivos Georgiadis, David C. Glahn, Janik Goltermann, Melissa J. Green, Dominik Grotegerd, Amalia Guerrero‐Pedraza, Minji Ha, Elliot Hong, Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol, Felice Iasevoli, Stefan Kaiser, В. Г. Каледа, Andriana Karuk, Minah Kim, Tilo Kircher, Matthias Kirschner, Peter Kochunov, Jun Soo Kwon, И. С. Лебедева, Rebekka Lencer, Tiago Reis Marques, Susanne Meinert, Robin Murray, Igor Nenadić, Dana Nguyen, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Fabrizio Piras, Edith Pomarol‐Clotet, Giuseppe Pontillo, Stéphane Potvin, Adrian Preda, Yann Quidé, Amanda Rodrigue, Kelly Rootes-Murdy, Raymond Salvador, Antonín Škoch, Kang Sim, Gianfranco Spalletta, Filip Španiel, Frederike Stein, Florian Thomas‐Odenthal, Andràs Tikàsz, David Tomeček, A. S. Tomyshev, Mario Tranfa, Uyanga Tsogt, Jessica A. Turner, Theo G.M. van Erp, Neeltje E.M. van Haren, Jim van Os, Daniela Vecchio, Lei Wang, Adrian Wroblewski, Thomas Nickl‐Jockschat

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalInstitut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleWhite matterOdds ratioPsychologyGrey matterSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Internal medicineConfidence intervalMedicinePsychosisMagnetic resonance imagingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Schizophrenia is associated with an increased risk of aggressive behaviour, which may partly be explained by illness-related changes in brain structure. However, previous studies have been limited by group-level analyses, small and selective samples of inpatients and long time lags between exposure and outcome. Methods This cross-sectional study pooled data from 20 sites participating in the international ENIGMA-Schizophrenia Working Group. Sites acquired T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans in a total of 2095 patients with schizophrenia and 2861 healthy controls. Measures of grey matter volume and white matter microstructural integrity were extracted from the scans using harmonised protocols. For each measure, normative modelling was used to calculate how much patients deviated (in z -scores) from healthy controls at the individual level. Ordinal regression models were used to estimate the associations of these deviations with concurrent aggressive behaviour (as odds ratios [ORs] with 99% confidence intervals [CIs]). Mediation analyses were performed for positive symptoms (i.e., delusions, hallucinations and disorganised thinking), impulse control and illness insight. Aggression and potential mediators were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms or Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Results Aggressive behaviour was significantly associated with reductions in total cortical volume (OR [99% CI] = 0.88 [0.78, 0.98], p = .003) and global white matter integrity (OR [99% CI] = 0.72 [0.59, 0.88], p = 3.50 × 10 −5 ) and additional reductions in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex volume (OR [99% CI] = 0.85 [0.74, 0.97], p =.002), inferior parietal lobule volume (OR [99% CI] = 0.76 [0.66, 0.87], p = 2.20 × 10 −7 ) and internal capsule integrity (OR [99% CI] = 0.76 [0.63, 0.92], p = 2.90 × 10 −4 ). Except for inferior parietal lobule volume, these associations were largely mediated by increased severity of positive symptoms and reduced impulse control. Conclusions This study provides evidence that the co-occurrence of positive symptoms, poor impulse control and aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia has a neurobiological basis, which may inform the development of therapeutic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→