MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391531743 · doi:10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-25

Optimal Quadrature Formula of Hermite Type in the Space of Differentiable Functions

2024· article· en· W4391531743 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
F.A. Nuraliev, Shaxobiddin Kuziev

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsQuadrature (astronomy)Hermite polynomialsDifferentiable functionType (biology)Space (punctuation)Applied mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisCalculus (dental)Computer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research work, a new derived optimal quadrature formula is discussed, which includes the sum of the values of the function and its first and second order derivatives at the points located at the same distance on the interval [0,1] in the L2(m)(0,1) space. we first obtain an analytical representation of the error function norm, and a system of equations of the Wiener-Hopf type construct using the method of Lagrange unknown multipliers for finding the conditional extremum of multivariable functions. Optimal coefficients found by solving the system. Using the exact form of the optimal coefficients, the norm of the error functional of the optimal quadrature formula for m=3 and m=4 calculate and the order of approximation was shown to be O(hm). The obtain theoretical conclusions confirmed by numerical experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicAerospace Engineering and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207