Unveiling Pandemic Patterns: A Detailed Analysis of Transmissibility and Severity Parameters Across Four COVID-19 Waves in Bogotá, Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This retrospective study on COVID-19's four waves in Bogotá, Colombia, scrutinises 1.77 million cases from March 2020 to April 2022, revealing significant shifts in both transmissibility and severity. The study highlights dynamic changes in the instantaneous reproduction number (Rt), with the highest values (> 2.5) corresponding to the ancestral and Omicron variants. There was a notable 88% decrease in the Case Fatality Ratio (CFR) from the first to the fourth wave, emphasising changing severity levels. The third wave, marked by the Mu variant, saw the highest case and death counts, yet paradoxically showed a decrease in CFR and an increase in the hospitalisation fatality ratio. Conversely, the fourth wave, dominated by Omicron, had the lowest severity despite higher hospitalisation rates in children. Additionally, the study records a consistent reduction in average hospital and ICU stay durations, from 10.84 days to 7.85 days and from 16.2 days to 12.4 days respectively, across the waves. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing epidemiological surveillance and adaptable public health strategies in lower-middle-income regions like Bogotá, deepening our understanding of COVID-19's impact in Latin America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".