A Cost-Efficient Approach for Creating Virtual Fitting Room using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Customers all over the world want to see how the clothes fit them or not before purchasing. Therefore, customers by nature prefer brick-and-mortar clothes shopping so they can try on products before purchasing them. But after the Pandemic of COVID19 many sellers either shifted to online shopping or closed their fitting rooms which made the shopping process hesitant and doubtful. The fact that the clothes may not be suitable for their buyers after purchase led us to think about using new AI technologies to create an online platform or a virtual fitting room (VFR) in the form of a mobile application and a deployed model using a webpage that can be embedded later to any online store where they can try on any number of cloth items without physically trying them. Besides, it will save much searching time for their needs. Furthermore, it will reduce the crowding and headache in the physical shops by applying the same technology using a special type of mirror that will enable customers to try on faster. On the other hand, from business owners' perspective, this project will highly increase their online sales, besides, it will save the quality of the products by avoiding physical trials issues. The main approach used in this work is applying Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) combined with image processing techniques to generate one output image from two input images which are the person image and the cloth image. This work achieved results that outperformed the state-of-the-art approaches found in literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it