MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391547913 · doi:10.1109/lmwt.2024.3358082

A Microwave Liquid Crystal Tunable Waveguide Filter Tuned by a Static Magnetic Field

2024· article· en· W4391547913 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)Materials scienceMicrowaveFilter (signal processing)Waveguide filterMagnetLiquid crystal tunable filterLiquid crystalMagnetic fieldOptoelectronicsWaveguideOpticsPrototype filterLow-pass filterEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents the development of a tunable waveguide filter utilizing liquid crystal (LC) material integrated within quartz glass tubes where the LC material is actuated by a static magnetic field. The proposed filter demonstrates a 7% tuning range with a minimal bandwidth variation. Experimental results are presented for a 7.5 GHz filter with a bandwidth of 2.5%, confirming the viability of the concept. The filter incorporates a single tuning element employing only one pair of magnets to reduce tuning complexity and improve reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it