MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391551061 · doi:10.1115/imece2023-112692

Theoretical Study of Counter-Current Liquid-Vapor Flow Under Condensation Conditions Over Non-Isothermal Vertical Wall of Two-Phase Closed Thermosyphon

2023· article· en· W4391551061 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Zolfagharroshan, Minghan Xu, Ahmad F. Zueter, Agus P. Sasmito

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermosiphonIsothermal processCondensationMechanicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsFlow (mathematics)Two-phase flowCurrent (fluid)Heat transferPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper proposes a new mathematical formulation describing the relationship between shear stress and film thickness to model condensing falling film of liquid in vertical thermosyphons. The mathematical model incorporates various factors, encompassing the contribution of shear stress resulting from friction force and phase change at the liquid-vapor interface, the impact of subcooling, and the influence of the convective boundary on film heat transfer. Vapor phase condensation in thermosyphons with relatively longer condenser lengths, where temperature variation is inevitable, is an area of interest for using the proposed model. The novel formulation is solved iteratively with the analytical solution of conservation equations, thermal equilibrium, and thermal resistance analogy. Optimized relaxation factors are used, and when the convergence criteria are met, the model marches over the condenser wall. The high accuracy of the model in regenerating literature data allowed the implementation of parametric study analyses on the variation of ambient air temperature, heat transfer coefficient, and wind velocity. The results are verified with a numerical model based on the modified Nusselt theory, and the underestimation of the latter approach in film thickness prediction and, consequently, heat flux has been discussed. The introduced model indicated the promising potential for laminar to wavy-laminar film regimes and could be applied to similar cases, such as co-current flows and evaporating thin films by minor revision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207