MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Narrowband Optical Signal Denoising Through All-Fiber Temporal Talbot Effects

2023· article· en· W4391557568 on OpenAlexaff
Majid Goodarzi, Manuel P. Fernández, Xinyi Zhu, José Azaña

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrowbandPhase noiseSIGNAL (programming language)WaveformNoise reductionComputer scienceOptical filterSignal processingOpticsBandwidth (computing)Noise (video)Optical fiberNoise floorTime domainElectronic engineeringPhysicsNoise measurementTelecommunicationsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and experimentally demonstrate an all-fiber Talbot-based method to denoise MHz-bandwidth optical signals buried under noise. The method achieves up to 9 dB of optical signal-to-noise ratio improvement for the multiple target signals. Additionally, our approach preserves an undistorted version of the input waveform with significantly improved quality. The method involves phase-only transformations in both the time and frequency domains, accomplished through appropriate temporal phase modulation and chromatic dispersion. These transformations effectively prepare the signal for noise removal, which is achieved through time-domain filtering. Subsequently, the inverse dispersion is applied to retrieve the processed and noise-filtered signal. The demonstrated technique is a promising solution for noise filtering in narrowband optical signals, with applications in microwave photonics and optical signal processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207