MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391561450 · doi:10.18260/1-2--40997

Work In Progress: Beyond Textbook: An Open Educational Resource Platform that Generates Course-Specific E-Textbooks

2024· article· en· W4391561450 on OpenAlexaff
Barney Wei, Mohammadreza Karamsoltani, Rui Zeng, Zheng Mingyu, Hamid Timorabadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Education and E-Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUploadLeverage (statistics)Open educational resourcesComputer scienceCurriculumMultimediaDownloadWorld Wide WebEducational resourcesOpen educationResource (disambiguation)PedagogyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beyond Textbook (BT) is an Open Educational Resources (OER) platform that combines an etextbook generation algorithm with a website interface.The frontend allows users to upload lecture notes.Then, given a list of topics, the backend matches each topic with the most relevant lecture notes, merges these lecture notes into one file, and finally generates a customized etextbook for users to view and download.BT is developed to provide instructors and students with an e-textbook that is customized to specific requirements in a course.BT offers a zero-cost avenue to deliver and access curriculum content in a standardized, but collaborative and dynamic manner.The goal is to reduce the financial barrier to education, allow students to have access to up-to-date educational content, and leverage modern technology to improve pedagogy and learning.We proceeded with a trial run of BT involving both instructors and students in a firstyear course and collected their feedback.Survey results identified that all participants found BT to be a useful educational tool and would use it upon its release.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpen Education and E-LearningFrench-language works237,207