Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weight problems are defined as a not unusual chronic sickness of excessive frame fat and has grown to be a global epidemic that is no longer the handiest gift within industrialized international but also in many growing and even underdeveloped nations. At gift, the prevalence of weight problems (described as body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) is within the range of 15 – 30% in the growing populations in Europe, North America, and many Arabic international locations, with an unequivocal trend for in addition, increases [1]. This circumstance will increase the risk of growing diffusion of negative results to human health ranging from metabolic disturbances, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and cardiovascular headaches to problems with locomotor machines and many types of cancer [2]. In addition, weight problems impair the subjective nice of life in affected human beings and can reduce existence expectancy [3]. Although there is a very specific relationship between excessive frame weight and the risk of diabetes, obesity may additionally result in many other disturbances that can aggravate the diabetic state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".