MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391568411 · doi:10.3390/proceedings2023091283

Dietetic Educators’ Perspectives on the Ways in Which Leadership Is Demonstrated by Dietetic Students and Interns: Insights from a Canadian Study

2024· article· en· W4391568411 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Billie Jane Hermosura

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMedical educationPsychologyPedagogyKnowledge managementMathematics educationEngineering ethicsComputer scienceMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objectives: As food and nutrition experts, dietitians are key to quality care for numerous patients and clients. Dietitians continue to find their place within the health care hierarchy and the ways in which they can be recognized as leaders in the healthcare system. In Canada, there is a new competency domain related to dietetic leadership; however, little is known about Canadian dietitians’ leadership development. The objective was to develop a foundational understanding of how leadership skills are currently taught through dietetic education in Canada. Methods: A documentary analysis of 13 Canadian dietetic programs and a focus group interview with dietetic educators was conducted as one phase of a doctoral study. The interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A data extraction tool was used to analyze the program documents, and thematic analysis was conducted on the interview transcript. Results: Findings from the documentary analysis provided a snapshot of how leadership was developed in students, considering leadership was not a core competency at the time of the data collection and analysis. Focus group participants agreed with the documentary analysis findings. They talked about how personal characteristics can be developed and shared examples of how they have seen students develop their leadership skills throughout their educational experience. There was no evidence that each program had a specific definition or conceptual framework for leadership; however, some of the educators talked about distributed leadership as important to dietetic practice. Where the focus group participants began to diverge from the preliminary findings was when they began to talk about specific program elements such as curricula, program or institution requirements, and education needs requirements. Discussion: Dietetic educators suggest that students demonstrate leadership through their ability to critically reflect, collaborate with other classmates, and develop and implement comprehensive plans. The main way dietetic students gain leadership skills outside of the program is primarily through extracurricular activities. Many of these activities are within, but not limited to, the nutrition and dietetics profession. Dietetic educators agreed that leadership can be developed in dietetic students, although some leadership characteristics are important when applying to a program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0370.011
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationFrench-language works237,207