MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391569570 · doi:10.5194/essd-2023-536

GMIE-100: a global maximum irrigation extent and irrigation type dataset derived through irrigation performance during drought stress and machine learning method

2024· preprint· en· W4391569570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fuyou Tian, Bingfang Wu, Hongwei Zeng, Miao Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Nana Yan, Yuming Lu, Yifan Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaU.S. Geological SurveyChinese Academy of SciencesAlliance of International Science OrganizationsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIrrigationDrought stressStress (linguistics)Water stressAgricultural engineeringEnvironmental scienceType (biology)Computer scienceWater resource managementAgronomyGeologyEngineeringBiologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Irrigation stands as the primary sector of human water consumption and plays a pivotal role in enhancing crop yields and mitigating drought effects. The precise distribution of irrigation is crucial for effective water resource management and the assessment of food security. However, the existing global irrigated cropland map is characterized by a coarse resolution, typically around 10 kilometers, and is often not regularly updated. In our study, we present a robust methodology that leverages irrigation performance during drought stress as an indicator of crop productivity and water consumption to identify global irrigated cropland. Within each irrigation mapping zone (IMZ), we identified the dry months occurring during the growing season from 2017 to 2019 or the driest months from 2010 to 2019. To delineate irrigated cropland, we utilized collected samples to calculate normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) thresholds for the dry months of 2017 to 2019 and the NDVI deviation from the ten-year average for the driest month. By combining the results with the higher accuracy between these two methods, we generated the Global Maximum Irrigation Extent dataset at 100-meter resolution (GMIE-100), achieving an overall accuracy of 83.6 %. GMIE-100 reveals that the maximum extent of irrigated cropland encompasses 403.17 million hectares, accounting for 23.4 % of the global cropland. Concentrated in fertile plains and regions adjacent to major rivers, the largest irrigated cropland area is found in India, followed by China, the United States, and Pakistan, ranking 2nd to 4th, respectively. Importantly, the spatial resolution of GMIE-100, at 100 meters, surpasses that of the dominant irrigation map, offering more detailed information essential for supporting estimates of agricultural water use and regional food security assessments. Furthermore, with the help of the DL method, the global central pivot irrigation system (CPIS) was identified using Pivot-Net. We found that there are 11.5 million hectares of CPIS, accounting for about 2.9 % of total irrigated cropland. In Namibia, the US, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Canada, and Zambia, the CPIS proportion was larger than 10 %. To our best knowledge, this is the first effort to identify irrigation methods globally. The GMIE-100 dataset containing both or irrigated extent and CPIS distribution is accessible on Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HKBAQQ (Tian et al., 2023a).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207