Establishment of terminal selector combinations in optic lobe neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
optic lobe with the greatest neuronal diversity, in which the identity of each neuronal type is specified in progenitors and newborn neurons via the integration of temporal, spatial, and Notch-driven patterning mechanisms. This identity is maintained in differentiating and adult neurons by the expression of neuronal type-specific combinations of terminal selectors, which are transcription factors expressed continuously during development and in the adult that are thought to control all neuronal type-specific gene expression. However, how the patterning mechanisms establish terminal selector expression is unknown. We have previously characterized the temporal and Notch origin of medulla neurons. Here we have used single-cell mRNA-sequencing to characterize their spatial origins and identified two new spatial subdomains. Together, this makes the medulla the first complex brain structure for which the patterning mechanisms specifying the identity of each neuronal type are known. This knowledge allowed us to identify correlations between patterning information, terminal selector expression and neuronal features. Our results suggest that different subsets of the patterning information accessible to a given neuronal type control the expression of each of its terminal selectors and of modules of terminal features, including neurotransmitter identity. Therefore, the evolution of new neuronal types could rely on the acquisition of modules of neuronal features predetermined by their developmental origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".