O ALIENISTA, FROM MACHADO DE ASSIS: FROM TALE TO COMIC BOOK IN THE FORMATION OF YOUNGER READERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comic books were, for a long time, marginalized and framed as an empty, contentless form of entertainment. However, they are currently read by people of all ages and all over the world. As a consequence of this, comics began to gain prominence, marking their presence in schools and being used to encourage the practice and taste for reading on the part of children and adolescents, showing themselves not only in works originally created in this format, but also in adaptations of literary classics, such as The Alienist, by Machado de Assis. The research, therefore, aims to address adaptations of classic titles, with the aim of showing how they, when used together with the original works, can instigate and encourage reading, with comparative elements as the analysis composition. At the end of the research, the main result of the investigation will consist of demonstrating the use of these texts to encourage literary reading, making use of previous strategies, involving pre-reading, reading and post-reading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".