Stability Descriptors for (Benz)imidazolium-Based Anion Exchange Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide (Benz)imidazolium-based polymers are a promising class of anion exchange membrane materials for alkaline fuel cells and electrolyzers. This study focuses on the alkaline stability of (benz)imidazolium-based compounds by exploring the relationship between molecular structure and degradation rate. A correlation analysis, using ab initio quantum chemical calculations, reveals suitable stability descriptors for three types of compounds, namely, benzimidazoliums, penta-substituted imidazoliums, and bis-arylimidazoliums. The strongest correlation is found between the Gibbs free energy change of the C-2 hydroxide attack step and the experimental stability. Notably, the activation energy and Gibbs free energy change of the hydroxide attack on C-2 display a high correlation. Identifying computationally efficient descriptors is a crucial prerequisite for the screening and inverse molecular design of imidazolium-based compounds with high alkaline stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".