The causes of wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) larval mortality in the Canadian prairies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), the wheat stem sawfly, is a well-established and important pest of wheat, Triticum aestivum Linnaeus (Poaceae), and its relatives in North America. Crop losses are caused directly by C. cinctus feeding inside wheat stems during larval development and indirectly when weakened plants lodge before being harvested. Understanding the factors that affect population dynamics of C. cinctus can help farmers to better manage it. Our study therefore explored how C. cinctus and natural enemy densities vary in space (southern Alberta, Canada) and over time. Five fields were sampled using an established protocol in fall 2019 and resampled in spring 2020; six additional fields were sampled in fall 2020 and resampled in spring 2021. Wheat stubs were dissected to record numbers of cut stems, C. cinctus larvae, and sources of larval mortality (i.e., parasitism, fungal infection). Densities of wheat stem sawfly and the impact of natural enemies varied between the sampled fields. No C. cinctus mortality was observed during the winter, indicating that C. cinctus population dynamics are not susceptible to mortality (abiotic or biotic) between years. Results of our study will be incorporated into new models to predict wheat stem sawfly phenology and risk to crop production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".