Maintenance excellence and CMMS criteria choice in the context of small hospital and healthcare organisations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As medical equipment has become more complex and expensive, the maintenance of this equipment requires special attention to improve outcomes and reduce costs notably in the small hospital and healthcare organisations (SHHOC). This research explores how SHHOC can improve maintenance management according to the maintenance employees' views, and what characteristics of CMMS can help these organisations to reach maintenance excellence. Based on qualitative research method, specifically a multi-case study, the research is conducted on 43 of 68 maintenance employees of small material maintenance services in three regions in the Est of Quebec. This research is a very beneficial source of information both for maintenance managers and stakeholders in making decisions about the maintenance excellence program and selection of CMMS. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is the first to address maintenance excellence and CMMS software selection criteria from the maintenance employees' perspective in the SHHOC context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it