MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391589844 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.103688

EPDet: Enhancing point clouds features with effective representation for 3D object detection

2024· article· en· W4391589844 on OpenAlexaff
Yidong Chen, Guorong Cai, Qiming Xia, Zhaoliang Liu, Binghui Zeng, Zongliang Zhang, Jonathan Li, Zongyue Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersZigong Science and Technology Program of ChinaJimei UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPoint cloudRepresentation (politics)Object (grammar)GeographyArtificial intelligencePoint (geometry)Computer visionComputer scienceCartographyObject detectionPattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingMathematicsGeometryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective 3D object detection relies on strong feature representation. Both global features and representative characteristics of the objects are vital for detection. However, traditional convolution’s perception range limits large receptive fields, and current object feature representation has room for enhancement. Addressing these concerns, we introduce a 3D outdoor object detector to enhance the point clouds feature, referred to as EPDet. Specifically, for global features, we propose a BEV-Offset Transformer in the BEV (Bird’s Eye View) domain. This adaptable module enhances semantic connections among objects, suiting various 3D detection methods. In addition, to refine point cloud features, we employ Focal Conv as our 3D ( 3-dimensional) backbone, exploring multi-modal fusion effects. In the 2D (2-dimensional) backbone, our Pyramid-like Conv captures detailed contextual features. EPDet performs well in the dense object scene owing to scene-wide global features captured by BEV Offset Transformer. In the multi-class tests, EPDet excels in detecting smaller objects due to more refined features represented by Focal Conv and Pyramid-like Conv. In experiments, as a plug-and-play module, we validate the BEV Offset Transformer’s effectiveness across single-stage (SECOND), two-stage (Voxel-RCNN), and multi-stage (CasA) algorithms. Robustness is tested on KITTI, NuScenes, and ONCE datasets. The proposed EPDet, in the KITTI subset, EPDet (CasA-based) achieves an impressive 85.56% accuracy in the car category. EPDet (Voxel-RCNN-based) surpassed baseline 1.65% mAP (mean Average Precision) (moderate subsets) in multi-class detection. The precision of EPDet is on par with the SotA (State of the Art) 3D outdoor object detectors based on point clouds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207