Alternate cleavage structure and electronic inhomogeneity in Ca-doped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-δ}$
Bibliographic record
Abstract
YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-δ}$ (YBCO) has favorable macroscopic superconducting properties of $T_\mathrm{c}$ up to 93 K and $H_{c2}$ up to 150 T. However, its nanoscale electronic structure remains mysterious because bulk-like electronic properties are not preserved near the surface of cleaved samples for easy access by local or surface-sensitive probes. It has been hypothesized that Ca-doping at the Y site could induce an alternate cleavage plane that mitigates this issue. We use scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) to study both Ca-free and 10% Ca-doped YBCO, and find that the Ca-doped samples do indeed cleave on an alternate plane, yielding a spatially-disordered partial (Y,Ca) layer. Our density functional theory calculations support the increased likelihood of this new cleavage plane in Ca-doped YBCO. On this surface, we image a superconducting gap with average value 24 $\pm$ 3 meV and characteristic length scale 1-2 nm, similar to Bi-based high-$T_\mathrm{c}$ cuprates, but the first map of gap inhomogeneity in the YBCO family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".