Statistical inference with regularized optimal transport
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Optimal transport (OT) is a versatile framework for comparing probability measures, with many applications to statistics, machine learning and applied mathematics. However, OT distances suffer from computational and statistical scalability issues to high dimensions, which motivated the study of regularized OT methods like slicing, smoothing and entropic penalty. This work establishes a unified framework for deriving limit distributions of empirical regularized OT distances, semiparametric efficiency of the plug-in empirical estimator and bootstrap consistency. We apply the unified framework to provide a comprehensive statistical treatment of (i) average- and max-sliced $p$-Wasserstein distances, for which several gaps in existing literature are closed; (ii) smooth distances with compactly supported kernels, the analysis of which is motivated by computational considerations; and (iii) entropic OT, for which our method generalizes existing limit distribution results and establishes, for the first time, efficiency and bootstrap consistency. While our focus is on these three regularized OT distances as applications, the flexibility of the proposed framework renders it applicable to broad classes of functionals beyond these examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.050 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".