MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391607112 · doi:10.1002/9781119131304.app2

The History of English

2023· other· en· W4391607112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raymond Hickey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory of EnglishHistoryMathematicsGenealogyGeologyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

English is a language of the Germanic group, a major branch of the Indo-European language family.Germanic is now subdivided into two groups, North and West Germanic. 1The present-day North Germanic languages are Danish, Swedish, Norwegian (Bokmål and Nynorsk), Faroese, and Icelandic.West Germanic consists of German, English, Frisian, Dutch, and Scots (if recognized as a separate language) along with Afrikaans, a colonial form of Dutch in South Africa, and Yiddish, the traditional language of East European Jews (and also of the Jewish diaspora, e.g. in New York).English is most closely related to Frisian, German, and Dutch.Historically, English is divided into four periods: Old English (450-1066), Middle English (1066-1500), Early Modern English (1500-1700), and Late Modern English (1700 to the present).Due to colonial expansion and, recently, due to its status as a lingua franca, English is found in most countries across the world.The main countries with native-speaker populations are Great Britain (England, Wales, Scotland), Ireland, USA, Canada, various Caribbean countries (notably Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago), South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand as well as various smaller islands, e.g. in the South Atlantic along with various Pacific islands.There are many pidgins/creoles deriving from English as a lexifier language, e.g. in West Africa in Sierra Leone, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon as well as in island nations of the south-west Pacific, notably in Papua New Guinea with Tok Pisin.Given the topic of the current book, this section will only consider historical change in the sound system of English (Hickey 2014e, Bermúdez-Otero 2007; Blevins 2006; Salmons 2010; Bowie and Yaeger-Dror 2015; Cser 2015) which has had a bearing on the varieties of the language which we can observe today.The study of English pronunciation has a long pedigree, going back at least to the sixteenth century, reaching an early zenith in the prescriptive works of scholars like Thomas Sheridan and John Walker in the late eighteenth century (Görlach 2001).A more objective, academic approach came to the fore a century later in the work of scholars like A.J. Ellis (1868-1889), followed at the beginning of the twentieth century by Henry Sweet (1908) and Joseph Wright (1905) and culminating in the establishment of modern linguistic phonetics in the work of Daniel Jones (see Jones 1918 as an early example of this). B.1 Old English (450-1066)This is the initial period in the history of English which lasted from the mid-fifth to the mideleventh century (J.Smith 2009).It begins with the traditional date for the arrival of the Germanic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207