551 - Continuous tralokinumab treatment over 4 years in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis provides long-term disease control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction/Background There is a need for additional long-term treatment options for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) that provide sustained disease control with a favorable safety profile. Tralokinumab, a monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in multiple countries. Clinical trials of up to 52-wk duration showed that tralokinumab was effective and well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with topical therapy. ECZTEND (NCT03587805) is an ongoing open-label, 5-yr extension trial investigating the long-term safety and efficacy of tralokinumab ± optional topical corticosteroids (TCS). Objectives To assess the efficacy of long-term tralokinumab treatment, we conducted a post hoc interim subgroup analysis restricted to the largest, most homogenous patient population, with the longest treatment duration. Methods Adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were continuously treated with tralokinumab ± optional TCS for 52 wks in the parent phase 3 trials ECZTRA 1 (NCT03131648) or ECZTRA 2 (NCT03160885) and for up to 152 wks in ECZTEND as of data cutoff April 30, 2022, were included. Endpoints included proportion of patients achieving Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear skin), at least 75% or 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) relative to parent trial baseline (EASI-75 or EASI-90), EASI ≤7, worst weekly pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≤4, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤5. Results are presented using observed data. Sensitivity analyses on patients who completed Wk 152 in ECZTEND (or who withdrew, but were enrolled in the study at least 152 wks prior to the study cutoff) were performed using modified non-responder imputation (mNRI) with discontinuations due to AEs or lack of efficacy imputed as non-responders and a 2-step multiple imputation (MI) for other missing data [Step 1: Missing data up to 1 year in ECZTEND were imputed using a standard regression-based MI method; Step 2: Missing data post 1 year imputed by carrying forward the within-subject area under the curve of days in-response]. Results 347 adult patients with a mean age (SD) of 42.2 (14.5) yrs and a mean EASI (SD) of 30.8 (13.7) at parent trial baseline were included in this analysis. After 4 yrs of total tralokinumab treatment (at Wk 152 in ECZTEND), IGA 0/1 [% (n/N)] was observed in 52.6% (92/175) of patients. EASI-75 {% (n/N) [95% CI]} was achieved in 84.5% (147/174) [78.4, 89.1] of patients as observed, and in 73.4% (254.8/347) [68.6, 78.3] using mNRI. EASI-90 was achieved in 64.4% (112/174) [57.0, 71.1] of patients as observed, and in 53.4% (185.2/347) [47.8, 59.0] using mNRI. Additionally, EASI ≤7 (mild disease) was observed in 84.5% (147/174) of patients, worst weekly pruritus NRS ≤4 (no to mild itch) in 68.0% (119/175), and DLQI ≤5 (no to small effect of AD on quality of life) in 79.0% (128/162) of patients. The safety profile was favorable and consistent with earlier analyses, with no new safety signals arising with continued tralokinumab use. Conclusions Continuous use of tralokinumab ± optional TCS provided long-term disease control over 4 yrs in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".