MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391613546 · doi:10.1029/2023ja032305

Evidence for a Current System and Potential Structure in the Martian Magnetotail

2024· article· en· W4391613546 on OpenAlexaff
Murti Nauth, D. L. Mitchell, C. M. Fowler, Imke de Pater, Abigail Azari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsGeophysicsMagnetic fieldInterplanetary magnetic fieldMars Exploration ProgramMartianElectronEarth's magnetic fieldMercury's magnetic fieldMagnetic reconnectionInterplanetary spaceflightElectric fieldDipole model of the Earth's magnetic fieldSolar windAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a case study of plasma and magnetic field observations in the Martian magnetotail using data from the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) mission during an orbit when the spacecraft was in the optical shadow, past the dusk terminator and downstream of the strongest crustal magnetic fields. In this region, we observed multiple magnetic field rotations (a signature of currents) closely associated with energized (up to 100 eV) electron populations. Several transitions between closed and draped magnetic topologies also occur in this region, which are likely to be caused by magnetic reconnection between the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and crustal magnetic fields. We also observe two regions of energized, counter‐streaming electrons, which are rare in the magnetotail, but twice as likely to occur downstream of strong crustal magnetic fields when they are near the evening terminator. Together, the multiple magnetic field rotations, topological changes, and counter streaming electrons suggest the presence of an electric potential structure similar to those observed above the auroral arc regions at Earth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207