Indigenous-Driven Youth Consultations: Reclaiming the Process through Meaningful Participation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La participation authentique des jeunes Autochtones s’inscrit dans le contexte historique plus large des consultations avec les peuples autochtones du Canada, qui reproduisent souvent la dynamique du pouvoir colonial. Cet article décrit une consultation qui, menée par des Autochtones au Québec, offrait des espaces adaptés à la culture où les priorités étaient établies par les jeunes. Les formats des consultations entreprises par quatre organisations autochtones reposaient sur (a) la mobilisation et la représentation des réalités diverses des jeunes, (b) la réappropriation du processus, (c) le soutien des voix et des identités des jeunes, et (d) les effets multiniveaux. Des approches appropriées et inclusives en matière de consultation favorisent la participation significative des jeunes, leur sentiment d’identité et d’appartenance, ainsi que leur autonomie. Ces pratiques novatrices illustrent la manière dont les jeunes autochtones se réapproprient les espaces politiques marginalisés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".