MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391618535 · doi:10.1080/15548627.2024.2314415

RABC1, an Arabidopsis RAB18 regulates binding and subsequent detachment of autophagosomes from the ER in autophagy

2024· article· en· W4391618535 on OpenAlexafffund
Yang Shao, Jiaqi Sun, Huanquan Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueAutophagy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutophagyRabEndoplasmic reticulumBiologyCell biologyGTPaseArabidopsisUnfolded protein responsePhagosomeSmall GTPaseVacuoleBiochemistryMutantCytoplasmSignal transductionGeneApoptosisIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macroautophagy/autophagy is a strategy cells use to cope with detrimental conditions, e.g. nutrient deficiency. Phagophores, the precursors to autophagosomes, are initiated and expanded on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, how phagophores and completed autophagosomes are linked to the ER remains incompletely understood. We recently unveiled a RAB GTPase-based linkage between the two structures. RABC1 is a plant member of RABC/RAB18 GTPases. Our biochemical and microscopy data indicated that RABC1 promotes autophagy in response to nutrient starvation, but not under ER stress. Under nutrient-starvation conditions, active RABC1 interacts with ATG18a on the ER, controlling the association of ATG18a to the ER. Subsequently, active RABC1 is turned off allowing expanded phagophores or autophagosomes to detach from the ER. Our work identifies a RAB GTPase-mediated autophagy process in plant cells, opening a door for improving crop productivity in the changing environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAutophagySame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207