MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391620768 · doi:10.11159/jffhmt.2024.004

Optimal Control for Thermal Management of Li-ion Batteries via Temperature-Responsive Coolant Flow

2024· article· en· W4391620768 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aaditya Rahul Sakrikar, Jacob Thomas Sony, Pranav Singla, Aniruddh Baranwal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass Transfer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Institute of Technology Bombay
KeywordsCoolantThermal management of electronic devices and systemsNuclear engineeringMaterials scienceIonThermalTemperature controlFlow (mathematics)Flow control (data)MechanicsMechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceThermodynamicsEngineeringChemistryPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Battery Thermal Management system (BTMS) is responsible for cooling, heating, insulation, and ventilation of the battery pack to ensure safe, reliable, and long-lasting operation of the battery pack under controlled optimal conditions.Cold plates are one of the most popular active thermal control methods used in BTMS.Most cold plate-based cooling strategies use a constant coolant flow rate.A possible method to improve this could be a temperature-responsive coolant flow strategy.This paper focuses on the optimal control of coolant flow for an active hydraulic BTMS with mini-channel cooling plates.An appropriate cost function was formulated to optimise the coolant flow, capturing the trade-off between thermal degradation and pumping power.A software framework was created to obtain the optimal solution for flow rate as a function of time.The results obtained after optimisation showed that an optimal cooling strategy for high heat dissipation generally has three phases -i) increasing flow rate, ii) saturated flow rate, and iii) decreasing flow rate, which gives a lesser cost when compared to a constant flow rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass TransferSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207