MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391625201 · doi:10.1002/9781394259816.ch18

Kenneth Leech(1939–2015)

2020· other· en· W4391625201 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Burns

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeechHistoryComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kenneth Leech's enduring popularity in Canada and the United States is important not least given his “prophetic” critique of what he saw as the preoccupation with individualistic self-development in forms of pastoral care and counseling in North America. Kenneth Leech tackled homelessness, migration, and multiculturalism, among many other concerns about social justice that emerged from the localized struggles in which he became involved. Kenneth Leech's writings frequently reference Alan Ecclestone, an exemplar of theological writing from a parish base. In one place Leech relates an anecdote about visiting a group to speak about justice and being told that he must often be “confused with the other Kenneth Leech who writes books on prayer and spirituality”. Kenneth Leech's work asserts both that race is a myth, a “biological fiction” and that racism is an absolute affront to the gospel of Jesus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTheological Perspectives and PracticesFrench-language works237,207