Intelligent Collective Escape of Swarm Robots Based on a Novel Fish-Inspired Self-Adaptive Approach With Neurodynamic Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fish schools present high-efficiency group behaviors through simple individual interactions to collective migration and dynamic escape from the predator. The school behavior of fish is usually a good inspiration to design control architecture for swarm robots. In this article, a novel fish-inspired self-adaptive approach is proposed for collective escape for the swarm robots. In addition, a bio-inspired neural network is introduced to generate collision-free escape robot trajectories through the combination of attractive and repulsive forces. Furthermore, to cope with dynamic environments, a neurodynamics-based self-adaptive mechanism is proposed to improve the self-adaptive performance of the swarm robots in the changing environment. Similar to fish escape maneuvers, simulation and experimental results show that the swarm robots are capable of collectively leaving away from the threats. Several comparison studies demonstrated that the proposed approach can significantly improve the effectiveness and efficiency of system performance, and the flexibility and robustness in complex environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it