Elucidating the Role of Flow Fields in Bubble Removal from Porous Transport Layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accelerating bubble removal from the porous transport layer (PTL) will be the key to reaching high current densities and cell efficiencies for polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) water electrolyzers by improving catalyst utilization through reduced bubble accumulation for enhanced water transport to reach reaction sites 1,2 . Previous studies have reported non-uniform bubble distributions within the PTL, where bubble saturation under the flow field lands was higher than that under the channel 3–5 . This bubble distribution heterogeneity was attributed to the PTL/flow field interface and PTL/catalyst layer interface, which caused non-uniform outlet and non-uniform inlet conditions for bubble transport within the PTL, respectively. As such, determining the impact of the interfacial conditions on bubble removal from the PTL is critical for optimizing designs for next generation PTLs that need to exhibit low reactant mass transport resistances for PEM water electrolyzers. In this study, we elucidated the effects of the PTL/flow field interface on bubble transport in the PTL and specified the role of flow fields in bubble removal from the PTL. First, X-ray computed tomography (CT) was employed to reconstruct the microstructure of a titanium fibre-based PTL. Pore network modelling was then implemented to simulate and analyze the multiphase flow behaviour within the PTL under two kinds of outlet boundary conditions, i.e., with and without a flow field. We showed a dramatic non-uniform bubble distribution within the PTL when using an outlet condition with a flow field, while a uniform bubble distribution occurred in the PTL when using an outlet condition without a flow field. We attributed this to the existence of flow fields that lead to longer gas transport pathways through the PTL regions under the flow field lands. This study demonstrates the effects of flow fields on hindering bubble transport within the PTL and informs the need of tailored designs of the PTL/flow field interface for accelerating bubble transport in the PTL. References J. K. Lee and A. Bazylak, Joule , 5 , 19–21 (2021). S. Yuan et al., Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. , 96 , 101075 (2023). J. K. Lee et al., Cell Reports Phys. Sci. , 1 , 100147 (2020). C. H. Lee et al., J. Power Sources , 446 , 227312 (2020). S. De Angelis et al., J. Mater. Chem. A , 9 , 22102–22113 (2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".