Correlation-Aided Joint Activity Detection and Channel Estimation for Multidevice Collaborative Massive Access
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates an uplink grant-free massive access (GF-MA) system, where a large number of IoT devices collaborate to achieve complex applications. For this scenario, device activity identification is a challenging problem due to the interference from massive devices and the limitation in the number of pilot sequences. By utilizing the inherent correlation features in multi-device collaborative scenarios, in this work, we present a detection approach that aims to enhance the accuracy of both activity detection and channel estimation. Specifically, we first propose a task-driven activity (TDA) model to capture the active probability in multi-device collaborative scenarios. Subsequently, considering the TDA model, we propose a message-passing-based algorithm named TDA-JDE for device activity detection and channel estimation. The proposed algorithm jointly processes messages containing channel impulse response (CIR), device activity, and task status information to leverage device activity correlation information. Finally, to obtain the parameters in the TDA model, we propose a parameter estimation algorithm based on the expectation-maximization framework with relaxation and reconstruction strategy (EM-RR). Extensive numerical results show that the proposed algorithm can achieve higher detection accuracy when compared with three benchmark schemes in multi-device collaborative massive access (MA) scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".