MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391646000 · doi:10.2196/55486

Correction: The Importance of Activating Factors in Physical Activity Interventions for Older Adults Using Information and Communication Technologies: Systematic Review

2024· erratum· en· W4391646000 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ellen Bentlage, John Jnr Nyamadi, Rosemary Dubbeldam

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhrasePsychological interventionSection (typography)Computer sciencePsychologyMedicineApplied psychologyNursingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In "The Importance of Activating Factors in Physical Activity Interventions for Older Adults Using Information and Communication Technologies: Systematic Review" (JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023; 11(1): e42968) the authors noted some errors].In the "Conclusions" section of the Abstract, the following phrase: So far, only a limited number of available BCTs (21/99, 21%) have been integrated. Has been changed to:So far, only a limited number of available BCTs (21/102, 21%) have been integrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.045
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.341
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0450.341
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.008
Bibliometrics0.0110.012
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0130.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealthSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207